AIDE, Adaptive integrated driver-vehicle interface. Workpackage WP 1.1 : DVE Modelling. Deliverable D1.2.4: Long-term phase test and results Portouli, Evangelia et al ; Hjälmdahl, Magnus ; Wiklund, Mats
Publication details: Thessaloniki The Centre for Research & Technology Hellas, CERTH. Hellenic Institute of Transport, HIT, 2006Description: 1 CD, 154 s. CDSubject(s): Online resources: Bibl.nr: VTI 2009.0008 RefLocation: Abstract: This deliverable presents the results of the work performed within activity 1.2.3 of AIDE project, entitled "Assessment of variables: Integration (long-term effects) phase. The objective of this work was to provide data on driving behavioural changes after long term use of five support systems, namely Cruise Control (CC), Speed Limiter (SL), Intelligent Speed Adaptation (ISA), Frontal Collision Warning (FCW) and Lane Departure Warning (LDW). Six studies have been performed. Four of them investigated a stand alone support system. In the ULeeds - VTI studies the ISA system was investigated, while in the PSA -TNO studies the LDW was investigated. In the INRETS-Renault study two functionally compatible systems were investigated, namely the SL and CC. The CERTH/HIT study involved two systems, namely the FCW and LDW, which were studied either as stand alone or as concurrently functioning. The methods that were used in these studies are broadly grouped, according to the data collected, into two categories: those that provide subjective data on how participants describe their adaptation to a given support system (this is the case in the INRETS - Renault and PSA - TNO studies) and those that provide objective data on participants' driving behaviour after long-term exposure to a particular system based on various measures of vehicle parameters (this is the case in the ULeeds - VTI and CERTH/HIT studies). The reported results indicate that long-term behavioural change is highly influenced by the number of the systems used, the compatibility of systems' functionality and the attitudes of participants. In specific, when two antagonistic support systems (namely FCW+LDW) function concurrently, drivers intentionally ignored both systems, whereas with two compatible support systems (SL/CC) no detrimental effects in regard to participants' interaction with the chosen support system was reported.This deliverable presents the results of the work performed within activity 1.2.3 of AIDE project, entitled "Assessment of variables: Integration (long-term effects) phase. The objective of this work was to provide data on driving behavioural changes after long term use of five support systems, namely Cruise Control (CC), Speed Limiter (SL), Intelligent Speed Adaptation (ISA), Frontal Collision Warning (FCW) and Lane Departure Warning (LDW). Six studies have been performed. Four of them investigated a stand alone support system. In the ULeeds - VTI studies the ISA system was investigated, while in the PSA -TNO studies the LDW was investigated. In the INRETS-Renault study two functionally compatible systems were investigated, namely the SL and CC. The CERTH/HIT study involved two systems, namely the FCW and LDW, which were studied either as stand alone or as concurrently functioning. The methods that were used in these studies are broadly grouped, according to the data collected, into two categories: those that provide subjective data on how participants describe their adaptation to a given support system (this is the case in the INRETS - Renault and PSA - TNO studies) and those that provide objective data on participants' driving behaviour after long-term exposure to a particular system based on various measures of vehicle parameters (this is the case in the ULeeds - VTI and CERTH/HIT studies). The reported results indicate that long-term behavioural change is highly influenced by the number of the systems used, the compatibility of systems' functionality and the attitudes of participants. In specific, when two antagonistic support systems (namely FCW+LDW) function concurrently, drivers intentionally ignored both systems, whereas with two compatible support systems (SL/CC) no detrimental effects in regard to participants' interaction with the chosen support system was reported.